Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: Atm machine in Deepak Sharma vs State Of Punjab on 2 March, 2021Matching Fragments
Learned State counsel does not dispute the custody period of the petitioner and the fact that he has also been involved in one another FIR. He further submits that though the ATM machine was taken away by the petitioner and the co-accused, yet the same could not be opened and the money was intact.
I have heard the learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner has been in custody since 31.10.2020 and it was a case of unsuccessful robbery. The trial will take time to conclude. Thus, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner behind the bars.