Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

No.2.

Heard counsel for the parties.

The relief claimed in this petition is to issue direction to the respondents to re-evaluate the examination papers of the petitioner. It is not in dispute that there is no provision for re-evaluation of any answer scripts. In absence of such provision, the relief claimed by the petitioner cannot be granted.

Counsel for the petitioner, however, placing reliance on the observations of the Division Bench in the case of Pranshu Indurkhya (Minor) Vs. State of M.P. and others, 2005 (2) MPLJ 315 submits that from the documents Annexure P-30, it is amply clear that it is a case of mala fide and tampering of the petitioner's record.