Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: "satta"game in Anurag Kumar vs The State Of Jharkhand ... Opposite ... on 18 February, 2025Matching Fragments
------
Order No.02 Dated- 18.02.2025 Heard the parties.
Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No.101 of 2024 registered under sections 419/420/467/ 468/471 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 66(C)/66(D) of the I.T. Act, 2000.
The Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the co-accused persons were involved in online Satta (gambling) games for cheating money of others and the petitioner is one of the persons who was monitoring the said Satta games. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in para-14 of the instant anticipatory bail application. It is next submitted that the persons inimical to the petitioner and his family members, have falsely implicated the petitioner in this case to harass him. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes to furnish sufficient security including cash security and also undertakes to cooperate with the investigation of the case. It is lastly submitted that the co- accused persons have already been given the privilege of anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 28.01.2025, passed in A.B.A. Nos. 597 of 2025 & 598 of 2025. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be also given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail.