Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: regularise deviation in K.S.Beevi Nurrani vs The Member Secretary on 13 December, 2023Matching Fragments
11. The second respondent further pleaded that the Multi-storeyed and Public Buildings Rules do not apply to the Madurai Corporation, since it was enacted under a different statute. Therefore, the second respondent prayed for dismissal of the Writ Petition.
12. The third and fourth respondents filed a common counter on 01.10.2012. In the said counter, it was stated that they were putting up a ten storeyed construction only after obtaining proper permission and permit. They denied the fact that there were deviations in the set back, but at the same time, pleaded that a revised proposal had been submitted to the second respondent, for which, they had paid a sum of Rs.2,02,516/- and that the same was pending. The plea on zoning regulation was denied. It was argued that it is a mixed residential zone and therefore, construction of building was proper. It was further argued that it is always open to the authorities to regularise the deviations in terms of the Town and Country Planning Act.