Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

1. Instant are Quashing petitions under Section 482 Cr.P.C. filed by accused persons Anbumani Ramadoss (Accused No. 1), K.V.S. Rao (Accused No.

2), Suresh Singh Bhadoria (Accused No. 6), Nitin Gothwal (Accused No. 9) and Dr. Pawan Bhambani (Accused No. 10) and Criminal Revision petition under Section 397 Cr.P.C. filed by CBI against accused persons Sudarshan Kumar (Accused No. 3), Dr. J. S. Dhupia (Accused No. 4), Dr. D. K. Gupta (Accused No. 5), S.K. Tongia (Accused No. 7) and Dr. K.K. Saxena (Accused No. 8). All these petitions are arising from impugned order dated 07.10.2015 in CBI Vs. Anbumani Ramadoss & Ors. vide CC No. 03/12 passed by Special Judge (P.C. ACT) CBI-01, Patiala House Court in FIR RC No. AC2-2010-A-0003/ACU-II, SPE/CBI/ND under Sections 120B, 420, 465, 468, 471 Indian Penal Code and Section 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) Prevention of Corruption Act. The said FIR was registered for taking action against all the 10 Accused persons and summoning them to face trial for the commission of the aforesaid offences.

CRL.M.C. Nos. 4442/2015, 5003/2015, 5005/2015, 5007/2015 & 58/2017 D. After this inspection report, Adhoc committee appointed by the Hon'ble Supreme court and Executive committee of the MCI recommended the Ministry to not renew permission for second batch of 150 MBBS students. Thereafter, vide letter dated 18.06.2008 decision was communicated to chairman, then on 26.06.2008 accused Suresh Singh Bhadoria requested Secretary Ministry of Health and Family Welfare for further inspection. On this the then Secretary Health directed accused K.V.S. Rao (Accused No. 2) to examine the request. Accused K.V.S. Rao Deputy Secretary, Joint Secretary and the Secretary endorsed the notes for approval for Minister for re-inspection by the Central team. Thereafter, on 19.07.2008 accused Minister Anbumani Ramadoss (Accused No.1) called for a meeting for discussion but did not agree with this proposal for re-inspection, and agreed with the recommendation of MCI not to renew permission for second batch of 150 MBBS students in Index Medical college. E. Consequently, a writ petition was filed by the college in the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India. Hon'ble Supreme Court of India vide order dated 11.08.2008 advised MCI to conduct inspection of the college. In compliance of the order, MCI conducted the inspection on 19.08.2008 and found shortage in faculty as well as clinical material. Thereafter, Hon'ble Supreme Court of India on 03.09.2008 directed MCI to submit its recommendation to the Government of India within 2 days and directed MoHFW to consider the matter within a week whether permission has to be granted and interested party may also be given an opportunity of being heard in person by the Ministry.

CRL.M.C. Nos. 4442/2015, 5003/2015, 5005/2015, 5007/2015 & 58/2017 F. Accordingly, MCI on 04.09.2008 on the basis of inspection report dated 19.08.2008 recommended Ministry not to renew the permission for second batch. Accused S.S. Bhadoria in compliance of the order dated 03.09.2008 appeared before accused K.V.S. Rao for personal hearing on 10.09.2008, thereafter vide note dated 11.09.2011 it was recommended that recommendations of MCI for not granting permission be accepted. It is also observed in the notes that MCI has pointed out serious deficiencies and the comments submitted by college authorities cannot be verified by 12.09.2008 the last date given by Hon'ble Supreme court of India, thus recommended that renewal of permission may not be granted. This note was approved by Joint Secretary, Secretary as well as the accused Minister Anbumani Ramadoss and decision in this regard was communicated to the Chairman Mayank's Welfare Society vide letter dated 12.09.2008. G. Thereafter, accused Suresh Singh Bhadoria again vide letter dated 16.09.2008 made a request to Secretary MoHFW to review the order dated 12.09.2008, and also requested for physical verification by team of Central Inspectors or to give permission for admission of 100 students, same was processed on 19.09.2008. However, accused K.V.S. Rao returned the file directing "to wait for the order of SC on 23.09.2008".

CRL.M.C. Nos. 4442/2015, 5003/2015, 5005/2015, 5007/2015 & 58/2017 L. But on the basis of inspection report dated 26.9.2008 conducted by Dr. J. S. Dhupia and Dr. D. K. Gupta, a note 38 dated 26.09.2008 put up by the accused Sudershan Kumar (Accused No.3) Section officer on the direction of accused K.V.S. Rao, and after processing the same both visited the office chamber of accused Dr. Anbumani Ramadoss. It is also alleged that in said note accused Sudershan Kumar manipulated the factual information of the report of central team and also the order of Supreme Court dated 22.09.2008 wherein there is no direction by Supreme Court to appoint the Central team, and in the late evening the approval was granted by accused Dr. Anbumani Ramadoss at his residence.