Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: Infrastructure Development in Rajender Singh vs Tdi on 27 May, 2011Matching Fragments
1. Consumer Complaint No.17 of 2009 (Pawan Gulati and another v.
Taneja Development and Infrastructure Limited and another)
2. Consumer Complaint No.68 of 2009 (Parveen K. Kataria and another v.
Taneja Development and Infrastructure Ltd and others)
3. Consumer Complaint No.69 of 2009 (Karandeep Singh Gulati and another v.
Taneja Development and Infrastructure Limited and another)
4. Consumer Complaint No.1 of 2010 (Uttam Singh v.
Taneja Development and Infrastructure Limited and another)
5. Consumer Complaint No.02 of 2010 (Rajender Singh v.
Taneja Development and Infrastructure Limited and another)
6. Consumer Complaint No.3 of 2010 (Mrs.Anju Gupta v.
Taneja Development and Infrastructure Limited and another)
7. Consumer Complaint No.4 of 2010 (Mr.Ravi Gupta v.
Taneja Development and Infrastructure Ltd., and another)
8. Consumer Complaint No.5 of 2010 (Mrs.Gurjeet Kaur v.
Taneja Development and Infrastructure Limited and another)
9. Consumer Complaint No.6 of 2010 (Inderpreet Kaur v.
Taneja Development and Infrastructure Limited and another)
10. Consumer Complaint No.64 of 2010 (Jagjeet Kaur Kahlon v.
M/s Taneja Developers and Infrastructure Limited and others)
11. Consumer Complaint No.65 of 2010 (Manjit Kaur v.
M/s Taneja Developers and Infrastructure Limited and others)
12. Consumer Complaint No.77 of 2010 (Jagjeet Kaur v.
Consumer Complaint No.17 of 2009 (Pawan Gulati and another v.
Taneja Development and Infrastructure Limited and another)
17. Ms.Sangeeta Dhingra and Ajay Dhingra had deposited an amount of Rs.10 lacs with the respondents against receipt dated 4.4.2006 for a plot measuring 204 square yards in TDI City @ Rs.24,500/- per square yard. The complainants purchased their booking and the transfer was accepted by the respondents on 9.5.2008 after charging a sum of Rs.1 lac from the complainants as transfer fee. The endorsement of transfer was made on the backside of the original receipt. The complainants again deposited an amount of Rs.5 lacs with the respondents on 9.5.2008. The allotment letter was not issued. The complainants received telephonic message and also the letter threatening the depositors to accept the plot measuring 120 square yards for the same amount in place of plot measuring 204 square yards, failing which, the registration booking would be cancelled and the amount would be forfeited. This letter was received on 28.1.2009. Hence, the complaint. The same relief was prayed as in CC No.2 of 2010.