Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: common plot in Godrej K. Divecha And Ors. vs Corporation Of City Of Bangalore And ... on 5 August, 1995Matching Fragments
6. The controversy regarding the legality and validity of the sanctioned plan is with reference to Zonal regulation No. 9 of Part II of Annexure-III. The said Regulation is set out below:
"9. Means of Access: The means of exclusive access which would be other than through public roads and streets, shall not be of more than 30 metres length from the existing public roads and streets. The minimum width of such access shall be 3.5. mtr. FAR and height of buildings coming up on such plots shall be regulated according to the width of public street or road. If the means of access exceeds 30.0 mtr in length, FAR shall be regulated with reference to the width of such access road. Construction of buildings on plots with common access/lanes from the public road/street shall be regulated according to width of such common access roads/lanes."