Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

Courses Marks obtained It was also stated in this letter (Annexure R-1) that petitioner was required to re-appear in all Courses.

.

8. In reply, it is stated that from record it was evident that petitioner had obtained 19 marks in Course III of MA (Economics) of first semester examination held in June, 2004 and said result was intimated to the petitioner vide letter dated 5.8.2008 (Annexure R-1) and for this reason consolidated marks sheet could not be issued to the petitioner. University has also placed on record the copies of award list (Annexure R-2 and R-3) pertaining to Course VI of MA (Economics) with respect to examination held in June, 2004. As per University, the award list for Course VI (Annexure R-2) was wrongly read as award list of Course III by Examination Branch of University and therefore, marks awarded in Course VI were mentioned against Course III of first semester and as no award was found against Course VI and thus candidate was shown as absent by Examination Branch of University in Course VI. In reply, procedure for preparing result has also been explained. It is stated that for examination held in June, the attendance sheets are normally received by Examination Branch in September/October of said year and result for examination is declared by second week of October and subsequently, Examination Branch prepares the result on tabulation charts and post preparation of tabulation chart, the same is re-checked by fresh set of persons, two in numbers in .

Examination Branch, and thereafter entries made in tabulation charts are posted in individual History sheet of concerned student/candidate and in present case initially on account of misreading, examination branch had posted award of course VI against Course III and since examination branch had not received any award from evaluation branch for Course VI, petitioner was shown as absent in Course VI. It is denied that petitioner has passed his MA (Economics) in the year 2005 as petitioner has re-