Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

41. It is, therefore, fallacious to contend that because some names of alleged participants may have been exaggerated or inconsistently attributed, the entire testimony of the eyewitnesses must be discarded. To adopt such a view would be to allow the truth of the prosecution case to be buried under minor inconsistencies and natural human errors in narration. The law is clear that so long as the substratum of the prosecution case remains intact and the core allegations against the principal assailants stand firmly established, the testimony of witnesses cannot be discredited wholesale merely for containing embellishments or inconsistent attribution of overt acts. Accordingly, the defence argument on this score bears little significance save and except to the limited extent that such inconsistent portions of the testimony cannot be acted upon. The remainder, which is consistent, coherent, and corroborated on material particulars, fully deserves acceptance.