Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: Dastbardari in Irshad Ahmad vs State Of U.P. And Another on 24 January, 2023Matching Fragments
6. About defendant Nos. 3 to 10 to the suit, who are not parties to this appeal, for reasons that will shortly be indicated, it was averred that the said defendants have no right in the suit property. It was also averred that defendant Nos. 3 to 10 have executed a conveyance of sorts, called a dastbardari of their share in the plaintiff's favour, who are now owners of the entire suit property. It may be remarked that there is no relief by way of injunction claimed against defendant Nos. 3 to 10. It is lastly averred by the plaintiff that defendant Nos. 1 and 2 are, despite the plaintiff's asking, persistent in their endeavour to take forcible possession of the suit property and interfering with his peaceful possession.