Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

Petitioner preferred second appeal being No. S.A.T 42 of 2009 before this High Court.
Opposite Party/ decree holder put the decree in execution before executing Court being Number ejectment execution case No.100/2009 and the same is pending before the Judge 3rd Bench, Small Causes Court, Calcutta.
On the date of delivery of possession, seal bailiff found that schedule of the original decree is not maching with the reality and accordingly possession could not be delivered.