Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

(ii) That respondents No. 3 to 7 be directed to made applicable all India Services (Medical Attendance) aules 4954 and settle the claim without any ceiling of amount.

(iii)

(iv) Any other order, direction or relief may be passed in favour of the applicant which may be deemed fit, just and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case.

That the costs of this application may be awarded.

The facts as stated by the Applicant is that he belongs to All India Services and is presently serving in Indian Forest Services in state of Rajasthan. His daughter, Kumari Yashna Jain was facing problem of hearing and speaking and she was admitted in Indraprastha Apollo Hospital, New Delhi on 30/04/2011. As per medical advice, she got operated and Cochlear Implant was carried out. She was discharged on 02/05/2011. The medical authorities charged Rs. 10,89,898/-

as per the chart given as follows:-

SNe) Description Amount (Rs.) | =" 1 Aidiometry Testings 2,600 pi. Scan 4,190 | 2 ee 9,410 | 3. Bed Charges, Consultations, Medical 10,73,728 4 Records, OT-Consumables including | (From which Rs cochlear implant nucleus C 1512 9,94,000/- towards cost PCT The applicant submitted the said Medical bill amounting to Rs. 10/89,898/- vide request letter machine, others services, pharmacy | of cochlear implant) atc. (Item wise details mentioned in the bill) |__| Medicines 270 [5 _____;----~_ Tetal 10,89,898 --

The respondents besides retreating the submissions have further stated that the order dated 22/04/2013 has been issued strictly in accordance with the provisions contained in All India Services (Medical Attendance) Rules, 1954 and Rajasthan Civil Services (Medical Attendance) Rules, 2008. Respondents further state that nowhere in the application made by the applicant 'tis shown that there was an emergent situation i here the daughter of the applicant was required w to be admitted and treatment was required to be ken urgently: It is further stated that implant ta "cochlear Implant" is not stated to be done in ergency and therefore the payment made to em ne applicant pertaining to the said medica} t expense is as per rules. Pertaining to the submissions that he is entitled to the full imbursement of the medical expense, it is stated that the Hon'ble Chief Minister is the competent authority under the Chief Minister Relief Fund for sanctioning the amount. It is further clarified that the medical reimbursement in case of the applicant does not show any case of emergency.

. . 1 reimbursement for Cochlear Implant of his daughter has been already made and therefore the present O.A. deserves to be dismissed as the applicant is not entitled for any relief. The factual matter of the case is that the daughter of the applicant was facing problem of hearing and speaking and after advice, was admitted in Indraprastha Apollo Hospital, New Delhi on 30/04/2011. And operation was conducted to implant "Cochlear Implant" and thereafter she was discharged on 02/05/2011. The applicant has submitted all medical bills amounting to Rs. 10,89,898/- with a request letter dated 04/05/2011 to the Government of Rajasthan. The Government of Rajasthan vide order dated 45/12/2011 allowed a claim of Rs. 3,15,155/-. since the applicant did not get his ful] claim of eimbursement he made representation to the r State Government but same was not admitted by the respondents as no action was taken by them. hereafter applicant approached _ this Hon'ble Tribunal in O.A. No. 54/2013 and this Hon'ble Tribunal vide order dated 29/01/2013 gave liberty to the applicant to file a fresh representation anq the respondents to consider the same Within a ef ----