Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

2.The appellate authority found that out of four charges three were proved and for dereliction of duty, the above punishment was imposed and the same was confirmed by the appellate authority, since the order of punishment does not suffer any infirmity. The proven charge against the writ petitioner is not properly receiving the property and assigning property number as per Form 91 received in the case in Cr.No.145/19 under Section 5(a) of Explosive Substance Amendment Act, for not placing final report received from the police in the file and not placing the surety bonds in the bail petition connected with crime No.115 of 2019 filed under Section 5 of the Indian Explosive Substance Act.