Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: parole+tada in Shrawan vs State Of Raj. And Ors. on 2 July, 2007Matching Fragments
3. On the other hand, Mr. B.K. Sharma, the learned Government Advocate has argued that according to the circular dated 2.5.2000, issued by the Jail Department prisoners convicted under the NDPS Act and TADA Act are no longer eligible for grant of parole. Therefore, the petitioner has rightly been denied the benefit of parole.
4. We have heard both the learned Counsels.
5. In the case of Jameel Ahmed v. State of Raj. and Ors. D.B. Civil Writ (Parole) No. 4953/06, decided on 5.1.2007 this Court had an opportunity to examine the circular issue by the Jail Department. In the said case, this Court had held as under: