Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: kfc in A N Traders Private Limited vs Shriram Distribution Services Private ... on 30 October, 2018Matching Fragments
4. The Arbitrator has rejected the objections of the petitioner holding as under:-
"21. That during cross examination, the witness of the Claimant has stated that the Respondent has given oral concurrences and continued to place Orders for supplies, in terms of the original Agreement on the Claimant and the operations continued in the Company. It is also the case of the Respondent that since they were the Franchisee of Yum Brands Inc, it had put a condition that the entire material required for running the KFC Restaurants would be purchased from the Claimant only. Admittedly under the Agreement between Yum Brands Inc and the Respondent, the Respondent was assigned the Claimant as the Sole Vendor / Distributor for managing supply chain. The scope of the responsibilities of the Claimant included procuring raw material, packing material, consumables etc. The Respondent has also relied on various other Judgments, namely, Taipack Ltd vs. Ram Kishore Nagar Mal - (143) 2007 DLT, Page 123.