Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

vii. That as per the EHS scheme only single­storey was constructed by DDA and further one floor was constructed by the allottee as per the plan provided by DDA as per the allotment.
CS no. 1916/2014
Expandable Housing Welfare Society v. DDA & Ors.
Page no.32 of 55 viii. The terms and conditions of the flat allotted in the year 1995 are in the brochure provided to the allottee in the year 1996.
xii. There is no other bye laws, guidelines, terms and conditions other than provided in Ex. PW1/4 which are applicable to the allottee of flat under EHS­ 1995­1996 situated in pocket 3, sector 19, Dwarka.
xiii. The layout plan Ex. PW1/8 is correct if it is as per the layout plan of DDA. The flats are of 8 categories as provided in the layout plan. The layout plan in Ex. PW1/4 is provided only for one category of flats allotted in pocket 3, sector 19, Dwarka i.e. Category 7 in Ex. PW1/8.
xiv. There is no plan other than provided in Ex. PW1/4, therefore, there is no sanction of any plan xv. He is not aware if any plan regarding the coverage of front or rear courtyard of the flats allotted under the EHS­ 1995­1996 is sanctioned by DDA.

47. The DDA has made applicable MPD­2021 in similar flats allotted in Janak Puri, therefore, on the ground of parity, plaintiff is entitled for the relief for considering the said flats under EHS scheme as plot. This fact has also been duly conveyed to the MCD that MCD may sanction the plan of the single­storey flats as plots as per MPD­2021 norms.

48. DW6 testified that once the expendable flats are converted into freehold flats DDA did not have any right there upon and it is no more concerned as to what the allottees did to an expandable flat as no rules of DDA are applicable to the said freehold flats.