Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

12. At this stage, this Court initially was of the opinion that the plaintiff may be entitled to some reliefs, however, upon an examination of the law in this regard, this Court deemed it appropriate to hear the arguments of the learned counsel for the plaintiffs on the clarifications sought in that regard, i.e., (i) whether the plaintiffs would be entitled to such liberty to implead the alleged infringers by way of an application post-decree of the suit, without having sought such a prayer in the prayer clause of the suit; and (ii) whether the Court while exercising its powers under Section 151 of the CPC, can extend the dynamic injunction to mirror/redirect/alphanumeric websites by empowering the learned Joint Registrar (Judicial) to pass appropriate orders on applications seeking impleadment of third parties post-pronouncement of the judgment.

17. Having heard the learned counsel for the plaintiffs, it would be worthwhile to extract relevant paragraphs of the UTV Software (supra) and Universal City Studios (supra) judgments as relied upon by the learned counsel for the plaintiff. The same reads thus:-

UTV Software Communication Ltd. v. 1337X.To and Ors.

"99. Though the dynamic injunction was issued by the Singapore High Court under the provisions of Section 193 DDA of the Singapore Copyright Act, and no similar procedure exists in India, yet in order to meet the ends of justice and to address the menace of piracy, this Court in exercise of its inherent power under Section 151 CPC permits the plaintiffs to implead the mirror/redirect/alphanumeric websites under Order I Rule 10 CPC as these websites merely provide access to the same websites which are the subject of the main injunction.

22. Another view could also be as to whether the lis would ever come to an end. In the manner proposed by learned counsel for the plaintiff, the suit would always be "alive" even after the judgment is pronounced or the decree is drawn up. A successful party can revive the suit even after a passage of long time. This would draw curtains upon the doctrine of finality attached to any legal proceedings.

23. With great respect and humility, in view of various pronouncements of the Apex Court as discussed above, I am unable to subscribe to the view taken in UTV Software (supra) and Universal City Studios LLC (supra) limited only in respect of the actions which could be taken by the plaintiff; and the right, authority and jurisdiction of the learned Joint Registrar (Judicial) to take up, adjudicate and implead a party in the first place; and further have any power at all to extend the dynamic injunction granted while the suit was subsisting, in the second; and all this, after the judgment is pronounced. It is made clear that the present examination is limited only to the post pronouncement of judgment exercise of powers by the learned Joint Registrar (Judicial) of this Court.

28. Undoubtedly, the concept of a dynamic or a dynamic + injunction is evolving and the Courts are grappling as to how to control or curb the menace and how to effectively implement its order. Currently, the only option available with a decree holder is to implement the decree by way of execution under the CPC. However, having regard to the technological advancements in the field of innovation and concepts like Artificial Intelligence and the rapid developments in use of the internet, rather misuse, the Courts have developed the law in relation to suits and executions to align with such technological advancements. However, the moulding of relief and innovation in the method of execution which may be required in view of the critical situation a plaintiff may face, cannot, in the humble view of this Court, travel beyond the confines of the CPC. Of course, that is till such time the Legislature amends the provisions of CPC or the Central Government introduces and engrafts drastic changes in the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021, which may assist the implementation of the Court orders in cases where dynamic + injunctions and decrees are passed. There is an urgent and alarming need for the Central Government and the Legislature to act in haste to bring about radical changes in CPC as also the IT Rules to suit, and align with the complex and critical issues that the citizens, organizations, and entities are grappling with. One can easily fathom the huge financial losses that institutions and companies etc. may face even after being successful in a litigation. Surely, no successful litigant can be expected to hold a decree and still be frustrated on account of non-implementation thereof.