Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

8. Per contra, Mr. T. Singhdev, learned Counsel appearing for Respondent No.2/NMC, submits that the learned Single Judge has dismissed the writ petition on the ground that the Appellant does not have basic qualification, i.e. Higher Secondary Certificate (12th Examination) with Biology. He submits that the Appellant has pursued her 11th and 12th class education with the subjects Physics, Chemistry and Mathematics. He states that in order to become eligible to get admission in MBBS course, the Appellant must have pursued her 11th and 12th with the subjects Physics, Chemistry, Biology and English. He submits that pursuing a 7 months course i.e., from April, 2014 to November, 2014 and, thereafter, obtaining 12th examination certificate from NIOS does not satisfy the conditions laid down in the Regulations. He submits that the eligibility requirement for taking admission in an undergraduate medical course in a Foreign University is governed by Foreign Medical Institution Regulations, 2002, which prescribes the minimum eligibility criteria, and the same has not been fulfilled by the Appellant.

9. Mr. Singhdev submits that the Judgments passed by this Court in cases of Tanishq Gangwar (supra) is distinguishable. He states that the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Kaloji Narayana Rao University of Health Sciences v. Srikeerti Reddi Pingle, (2021) 14 SCC 134, has also been followed by a Division Bench of High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Indore in the case of Sohan Chouhan vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh in W.P. (C) 3619/2022 dated 21.02.2022.