Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: reverse engineering in Pawan Deep Singh Bahl vs Princep Supply Agency on 6 December, 2013Matching Fragments
5. The plaintiff states that he had also obtained a sample of the product manufactured by the defendant for the purposes of comparison and evaluation. Upon comparing the two products, he found the two to be identical in terms of design as well as technical drawings. Even the colours adopted by him are stated to have been copied by the defendant. He states that from a bare look at the two products, it is almost impossible to differentiate except for the fact that his product bears the mark „VENUS OPTITECH‟ and the defendant‟s as „SKI'. The plaintiff claims that the defendant has copied the entire product by reverse engineering, by infringing the copyright and design belonging to him, and thereby constituting passing-off and unfair competition by the defendant.