Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

(i) CRA-S-2396-SB-2017 preferred by the appellant-Vikas Garg is allowed.

(ii) CRA-D-653-DB-2017 preferred by Karan and CRA-D-662- DB-2017 by Hardik stand dismissed.

(iii) The impugned judgment/order dated 24th of May, 2017 passed by Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge, Sonepat in FIR 71 of 73 other connected cases No. 144 dated 11th April, 2015 registered under Sections 376D, 376(2)(n), 376, 292, 120-B, 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 67 of the I.T. Act, at Police Station Rai Sonepat, whereby the appellant-Hardik was convicted and sentenced to undergo R.I. of 20 years under Section 376(D) IPC, R.I. of Ten years under Section 376(2)(n) IPC, R.I. of Seven years under Section 120-B IPC, R.I. of Two years under Section 292 r/w Section 34 IPC, R.I. of Two years under Section 506 IPC and R.I. of Five years under Section 67-A of the Information Technology Act, 2000; appellant-Karan was convicted and sentenced to undergo R.I. of Twenty years under Section 376(D) IPC, R.I. of Ten years under Section 376(2)(n) IPC r/w 120-B IPC, R.I. of Two years under Section 292 IPC r/w 34 IPC and R.I. of Five years under Section 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000, and appellant-Vikas was convicted and sentence to undergo R.I. of Seven years under Section 376 IPC r/w 120-B IPC, R.I. of Two years under Section 292 r/w 34 IPC and R.I. of Five years under Section 67-A of the Information Technology Act, 2000, is set aside qua appellant-Vikas Garg only and, is maintained qua appellants namely Karan and Hardik.