Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: LSD in Sri Balaji C vs State Of Karnataka on 7 July, 2022Matching Fragments
This petition is filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail of the petitioner in Crime No.20/2021 of Kumaraswamy Layout Police Station, Bengaluru City, for the offence punishable under Sections 22(c) and 27(a) of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 ('NDPS Act' for short).
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for the respondent-State.
3. The factual matrix of the case of the prosecution is that on credible information, accused No.1 was apprehended and seized 334 LSD strips and cash of Rs.530/- on 18.01.2021 in between 3.45 p.m. to 5.45 p.m. and mahazar was done and the value of the same is around Rs.7 lakhs. The FIR is also registered against accused No.1 and it is the case of the prosecution that on the second day, an amount of Rs.27,50,000/- was recovered at the instance of the petitioner. It is also the case of the prosecution that on the next day, accused Nos.1 and 2 were taken to the room of accused No.1, wherein seized 9310 LSD strips and the same is worth of Rs.1 Crore. Hence, charge-sheet is filed against this petitioner also based on the voluntary statement of accused No.1 and both of them joined together in trafficking the LSD strips.
5. Per contra, the learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for the respondent-State submits that on 19.01.2021, an amount of Rs.27,50,000/- was seized at the instance of the petitioner. The learned counsel submits that 9310 LSD strips was seized from the house of accused No.1 and at that time, this petitioner was very much present and he used to supply LSD strips and he is operating all over the country and by mistake, the seizure of 9310 LSD strips is not mentioned in the charge-sheet and hence there is a prima facie case against the petitioner herein.
6. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for the respondent-State and also on perusal of the material available on record, at the first instance, 334 LSD strips and cash of Rs.530/- were seized at the instance of accused No.1 and subsequently, the amount was recovered at the instance of the petitioner and also apple mobile phone and 3 laptops. On the next day, according to the prosecution, joint recovery was made at the instance of the petitioner and accused No.1. On perusal of P.F. available at page No.54, it is mentioned that recovery is made at the instance of accused No.1 and not at the instance of this petitioner stating that the same was there in the room of accused No.1. The main contention of the prosecution is that this petitioner is the peddler operating all over the country. Though there is no recovery at the instance of the petitioner, the petitioner was present along with accused No.1 and seizure was made from the room of accused No.1 and not at the conscious possession of this petitioner. The only material relied upon by the prosecution is the voluntary statement of accused No.1 and no doubt, cash of Rs.27,50,000/- was recovered at the instance of the petitioner and when the petitioner claims that he is a gold merchant and also produced GST certificate to show that he is a gold merchant having proprietary business and in the absence of any material, continuing this petitioner in custody after 1½ years amounts to pre-conviction and hence it is a fit case to exercise the discretion in favour of the petitioner with conditions.