Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

15. The case of the Petitioner herein is that the statement that an appeal in relation to the ACRs for 2004-2005 was pending is a misleading one, since the appeal by Respondent No.4 against the adverse remarks in ACR for 2004-2005 already stood rejected on 10th April, 2007.

16. On 23rd October, 2018 a review DPC was convened. Respondent No.4 was found fit to be promoted as Additional DIG with effect from 30th May, 2007. The Petitioner filed an application under the Right to Information Act, 2005 (RTI Act) seeking a copy of the proceedings of the aforementioned review DPC. By a response dated 22nd March, 2019 the Petitioner was informed by the Respondents that the ITBP, in terms of the second Schedule to the RTI Act, was exempted from providing information/documents unless it related to allegations of corruption and human rights violations.