Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

05. The appellant/complainant has assailed the impugned order of the learned State Commission dated 28.02.2018 on the grounds inter alia that the learned Commission has awarded him the compensation amount of only Rs. 15.00 lacs as against the compensation amount of Rs. 60.00 lacs claimed by him on account of his huge loss in the business, mental trauma and defamation. That the respondent-Bank/opposite party through the fraudulent and unauthorized debit vouchers withdraw an amount of Rs. 42,69763/- from his Cash Credit Loan Account and transferred the same into the loan account of his brother namely Sheikh Irfan Farooq maintained by him with the Branch Unit at Bhogal New Delhi as also into a bogus and fictitious personal consumption loan account attributed to have been opened by him at the aforesaid Branch Unit Bhogal New Delhi. That the impugned award is not in conformity with the material that was made available on the file as the learned Commission has not considered the statements of his business turnover during the years 2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15 showing substantial decrease and reduction of his business turnover as compared to the year 2011-12. That the respondents/opposite parties even during the pendency of the complaint before the learned State Commission published twice the notices under SARFAESI Act in the local press thereby adversely affecting his reputation in the business community, resulting in the substantial loss of his business. That the quantum of the compensation awarded by the State Commission to the tune of Rs. 15.00 lacs only as against the claimed amount of Rs. 60.00 lac is highly disproportionate, unreasonable, unjust and violative of the principal of natural justice.