Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

2. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, without prejudice to the rival contentions, I deem it just and proper to allow I.A. No.3/2024 and direct the jurisdictional Additional Director of Land Records (ADLR) to conduct joint survey/inspection in the presence of petitioner and respondents and to submit a report in this regard by the next date of hearing.
3. Liberty is reserved in favour of the parties to submit their respective memos of instructions to the Court Commissioner/ADLR for the purpose of carrying out commission work.
4. The ADLR is directed to conduct joint survey/inspection on 28.10.2024 in the presence of parties and submit a report by the next date of hearing.
5. All parties are directed to be present at the spot on 28.10.2024 without awaiting further notice from the ADLR.
6. Re-list the matter on 11.11.2024.
-6-

NC: 2024:KHC-K:9003

7. As can be seen from the aforesaid interim order, the joint survey was directed to be conducted in order to point out whether any portion of the subject land falls within either the prohibited area, protected area or regulated area under the said Act of 1958. In this context, a perusal of the report dated 25.11.2024 submitted by the ADLR, Vijayapura, will indicate that no portion of the subject land falls within any portion of the aforesaid three areas and consequently, the question of approving the layout plan by treating the portion of the subject land as "Buffer Zone" as indicated in the impugned proceedings, is clearly illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the fact situation obtaining in the spot and as such, the same deserves to be quashed.