Skip to main content
Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law
Document Fragment View
Matching Fragments
For proper understanding the principle laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in
the said decision the prohibition which was in fact imposed under Section 21 of the said
Act is required to be taken note of. Paragraph 5 of the said decision of the Hon'ble
Supreme Court may be considered in this regard, as Hon'ble Supreme Court recorded
therein the exact term in which such prohibition was imposed therein. It was recorded
therein that "what is prohibited under Section 21 of the said Act is that there cannot be
any sub-division or sub-letting of the land held by a tenant by assignment of any interest
thereunder" with a rider that "exceptions are there, when a tenant dies, the surviving
members of the joint family and if he is not a member of the joint family, his heirs shall be
entitled to partition and sub-divide the land leased subject to certain conditions". Section
24 of the said Act was also taken note by the Hon'ble Supreme court wherein it was
declared that when a tenant dies, the tenancy devolves upon the heirs of such tenant on the
same terms and conditions on which the tenant was holding at the time of his death. In this
regard the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that assignment of any interest of the tenanted
land by way of device or a bequest under a will cannot be stated to be left beyond the
scope of the said provision inasmuch as assignment disposes of the rights of the lessee in
the leasehold property. The Hon'ble Supreme Court further held that when there is a
disposition of right under a will, though it operates posthumously, is nevertheless a
recognition of the legatee therein as to his right in the tenanted land and in that event
deposition by will is also an assignment of the tenanted land even though the legatee's
right will come into effect after the death of the testator. It was thus, held that though it
can be stated in general terms that device simplicitor will not amount to assignment but in
a special case of this nature, interpretation will have to be otherwise.