Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

10. In parcha no. 5, dated 20.8.2006, he tried to find out the accused-appellants of this case. On 23.8.2006, he arrested the named accused Phool Chand, who confessed to have committed offence and, thereafter, his remand was obtained for getting his statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. On 24.8.2006, in Parcha No. 7, he recorded statement of eye-witness Aditya Narayan. In parcha no. 8, dated 29.8.2006, he arrested the accused Heera Lal and recorded his statement, who also confessed to have committed offence, hence report was sent for getting his statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. In parcha No. 9, dated 31.8.2006, the surrender of the accused- Hari Shankar has been mentioned. In parcha no. 10, dated 03.9.2006, he recorded statement of eye-witness Rajendra Prasad Mishra. In parcha No. 11, dated 8.9.2006, he made search of the wanted accused persons and made raids at their places. In parcha no. 12, dated 13.9.2006, he recorded technical inspection. In parcha No. 13, dated 17.9.2006, he recorded statement of HCMT Jai Prakash Mishra in which apart from the Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 210, 404 and 427 IPC, during investigation, offence of Section 14 D.A.A. Act was also added. In parcha no. 14, dated 19.9.2006, the search of the accused was made. In parcha no. 14-A dated 19.9.2006, the confessional statement of accused Hari Shankar Tiwari, who was taken on remand, was recorded and its report was separately sent to the court. In parcha no. 15, dated 25.9.2006, entry was made in respect of the wanted accused Suneel Dwivedi of P.S. Vargadh, who had appeared in some case before the court and his warrant was prepared. In parcha No. 16, dated 28.9.2006, accused were taken on remand. In parcha no. 17 dated 2.10.2006, the men of wanted Dadua gang were sought to be searched. In parcha No. 18, dated 8.10.2006, there is endorsement of panchayatnama, post-mortem report and other papers of deceased Munni Lal and deceased Harish Chandra Mishra and also statement of constable Suraj Bali. In Parcha No. 19, dated 11.10.2006, the remand was taken of accused persons and in parcha no. 20, dated 14.10.2006, the statement of witness Amarnath was recorded. In parcha no. 21, dated 18.10.2006, remand of the accused was taken. In parcha No. 22, dated 19.10.2006, after taking remand from the court, statement of accused Sunil Kumar has been taken, who has confessed to have committed this offence. In parcha no. 23, dated 22.10.2006, statement of Ram Dayal Tiwari and Sant Ram Mishra, were recorded and on the basis of their statement, it transpired that Kamta Prasad was also involved in the incident and he tried to search the absconded accused persons by making raid at their place. In parcha no. 24 dated 26.10.2006, he submitted charge sheet no. 51 of 2006 against the accused Phool Chand and others and sent the same to court which was registered as S.S.T. No. 226 of 2006, which is Ext. Ka-25 and against rest of the accused, investigation was kept pending.

11. Thereafter, in supplementary parcha no. 1, dated 30.10.2006, he obtained non bailable warrant and warrant under Section 82 Cr.P.C. against accused Dadua, Radhey, Sugreev, Bhonda @ Gotar, Natthu @ Chelwa Kol, Dadu Kol, Rohini @ Tehsildar, Ashok Kol and search was made against the absconded accused. In supplementary parcha no. 2, dated, 30.10.2006, search was made against the absconded accused Natthu, Dadua, Ashok, Aniruddh, Ram Sagar, Munshiwa Kol but could not be found and the statements were recorded of the witnesses before whom proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. was executed and these witnesses were namely Raja Ram, Bhagwan Deen, Vinod Kumar, Ravi Payasi, Lalman, Nathuwa, Munn, Ram Kushal, Mukhiya and Raghuraj and apart from that of Rewati Raman, Vivek Kumar. Vide parcha no. 3, dated 1.11.2006, remand was prayed for till the production of the accused before the court. Vide supplementary parcha no. 4, dated 4.11.2006, search for absconded accused was made. In supplementary parcha no. 5, dated 5.11.2006, absconded accused were searched and warrant under Section 82 Cr.P.C. was tried to be executed. The supplementary parcha no. 6, dated 7.11.2006, and parcha no. 7, dated 9.11.2006, were written and, thereafter, in supplementary parcha no. 8 dated, 10.11.2006, he recorded statement of Subhash Yadav (S.O.) Raipura and also obtained warrants against absconded accused under Section 83 Cr.P.C. In supplementary parcha No. 9, dated 13.11.2006 and supplementary parcha no. 9-A of the same day, the statement of witnesses of attachment of properties of the accused namely Raghunandan, Heera Lal, Smt. Ram Pyari, Premwati, Munshiwa, Rajman Kol, Ramsukh and Shiv Kumar were recorded. In supplementary parcha no. 10, dated 14.11.2006, the witnesses of attachment namely Uma Shankar Mishra, Baboo Mishra, Sharda Prasad, Pawan Kumar and Bhullan were recorded and the attached property was deposited in possession of the police and its entry was made in G.D. and after finding sufficient evidence against accused Munshiwa Kol, Ramsagar, Chhota @ Shivkaran Patel, Radhey @ Subedar, Natthu Kol, Raju Kol and Ashok Kolgun and charge sheet no. 51-A of 2006, dated 14.11.2006, was submitted under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 201, 404 and 427 IPC and 14 DAA Act, which is available on the file of S.S.T. No. 240 of 2006, which is Ext. Ka-A-1. He submitted charge sheet against this accused in abscondance and against rest of the accused, investigation was kept pending. In supplementary parcha No. 11 dated 18.11.2006, making mention of the earlier attached property of accused Shiv Kumar @ Dadua, Bhonda @ Gotar and Rohini @ Tehsildar, the statement of S.I. M.P. Singh, H.C.P. Vyasmuni Mishra and Constable Shivram were recorded. In supplementary parcha no. 12, dated 20.11.2006, the memorandum of plain soil as well as blood soaked soil was sent to FSL for examination and the statement of H.C. Ram Hirday Sharma was recorded, who has taken the same to F.S.L. and, thereafter, search of the absconded accused was also made. In supplementary parcha no. 13, dated 23.11.2006, entry was made regarding attachment of the properties of absconded accused and also statements of witnesses of attachment namely Vivek Kumar Mishra, Ram Sanehi, Rewati Raman and Mohan were recorded and after finding sufficient evidence against accused, Dadua @ Shiv Kumar, Rohini @ Tehsildar, Bhonda @ Gotar, Angad, Sugreev and Aniruddh Yadav, charge sheet no. 51-B of 2006 was submitted on 22.11.2006, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302 and 201 and 14 D.A.A. Act which was registered as S.T. No. 226 of 2006, which had been proved as Ext. Ka-27 in the said S.S.T. and the same was again verified by him. In supplementary parcha no. 14, dated, 29.11.2009, the wanted accused Aniruddh Yadav surrendered before court and permission for recording his statement was taken from court. In supplementary parcha No. 15, dated 3.12.2006, the remand of accused Anirudh Yadav was recorded in District Jail, Banda in which he admitted to having been involved in giving effect to this incident and also stated that he would get the licensed gun, which was used in commission of this offence, recovered and on the basis of that statement, separate prayer for his remand was made. As per supplementary parcha no. 17, dated 9.12.2006, his remand was allowed from 10 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.. Pursuant to that remand, police custody prayer was made before District Jail which was refused saying that no such order had been received by him and, thereafter,  the court inspector personally apprised about the same. In supplementary parcha no. 19 dated 11.12.2006, the search of father of accused Anirudh Yadav was made and his uncle Ram Sanehi was enquired in respect of the licensee double barrel gun of Aniruddha, who apprised that Anirudh Yadav had gone away after placing his licensed gun at his house, which was given by him to his father Mata Badal who is his real brother as they were living together. The said gun was got deposited by Mata Badal under the orders of S.D.M. in Rajpoot Gun House in the name of repairing on 30.11.2006. Therefore, he recorded statement of Mata Badal also. In supplementary parcha no. 20 dated 15.12.2006, after showing a copy of the order of the court to the S.D.M., the order was obtained for receiving the gun from Rajpoot Gun House but the same could not be found because of the parts of the said gun being dismantled. In parcha no. 21 dated, 18.12.2006, the remand of accused was prayed for. In parcha No. 22, dated 23.12.2006 also remand was prayed. On 28.11.2006, the concerned case property which were sent to F.S.L. for examination, S.I. Noor Mohammad was directed to collect the double barrel gun from Rajpoot Gun House, which was received from there and its memorandum was prepared which is Ext. Ka-28 in S.T. No. 226 of 2006 and its copies filed in the present case as paper no. 9-Ka. In parcha no. 24 dated 15.11.2007, statement of witnesses Sanjay Singh, Suneel Kumar and Dharampal were recorded and charge sheet no. 51-C of 2006 against accused Anirudh Yadav was submitted under Section 30-A of the Arms Act, which is Ext. Ka-26 in S.S.T. No. 226 of 2006 and further stated that against the said accused, another charge sheet no. 51-B of 2006 had been sent by him on 23.11.2006 and also against other accused the charge sheet had been submitted which are on the file of S.S.T. No. 226 of 2006, 240 of 2006, 240-A of 2006, 240-B of 2006 and S.S.T. No. 14 of 2006.