Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

(Slides Naresh Kumar) and exhibit-16 (Slides, Vijay Kumar.) (2) Human blood was found in exhibit-2 (Blood sample Anu Kumari) exibit-3 (Blood sample Anu Kumari), exibit-10 (Blood sample Vijay Kumar) and exhibit-14 (Blood sample Naresh Kumar). (3) Blood was detected in traces on exhibit-4 (Vaginal smear slides Anu Kumari) but it was insufficient for further examination human semen was found on the exhibit.

(4) Blood was not detected on exhibit-5a (Pants Anu kumari), exhibit-8a (Underwear of Vijay kumar), exhibit 8b (T-shirt Vijay Kumar), exhibit 11-b (Underwear Naresh Kumar) and exhibit-19 (Bed Sheet) but human semen was not found on the exhibits. (5) Human blood was found on exhibit-5b (Upper/hood Anu Kumari) and exhibit-5c (Underwear Anu Kumari) but semen was not detected on the exhibits. (6) Blood was detected in traces on exhibit-5d (Pad Anu Kumari and exhibit-20 (Bed sheet) but it was insufficient for further examination. Semen was not detected on the exhibits. The report Ex.PW7/A (Two leaves) bear his signature in red circle A with stamp of scientific officer. He has stated that blood was detected in traces upon pad and vaginal smear slide which was not sufficient for further examination. He has .

Medical officer has stated that there was no bleeding from the valva. Medical officer has stated that there was smelling of discharge with white colour. Medical officer has stated that there was no injury or bleeding in the vagina of prosecutrix.

Medical Officer has stated that hymen was torn at 3 0'clock position. Medical officer has stated that there was no stains of semen or blood on the Jeans. Medical officer has stated that prosecutrix has menstruation four days ago. Medical officer has stated that there was no semen stains on the external genitalia. Medical officer has stated that MLC Ext PW18/B was issued. Medical officer has stated that after receiving FSL report blood was detected in traces and human semen was also detected upon vaginal slides of prosecutrix.

9.20. PW20 Dr.Amrish Kapoor has stated that in the year 2009 he was posted as Gynecologist in Zonal Hospital Solan. He has stated that he found blood traces and also found human semen in the vaginal slide of prosecutrix. He has stated that definite opinion was not given because DNA test of semen and DNA test of blood of accused persons was not supplied for comparison. He has stated that intercourse was committed upon prosecutrix on the basis of traces of human semen in the vaginal slide of prosecutrix. He has stated that there was no mark of injury on the body of prosecutrix. He has stated that there was no injury upon .

16. We have carefully perused the report of FSL Junga Ext PW7/A placed on record. As per chemical analyst report Ext PW7/A placed on record blood and semen was not .

detected upon pubic hair and bra of prosecutrix and upon pubic hair, vest and slides of accused persons. As per chemical analyst report blood was detected in traces of vaginal smear slides of prosecutrix but same was insufficient for further examination. As per chemical analyst report human semen was found on vaginal slides of prosecutrix but prosecution did not obtain semen of accused persons and did not sent semen of accused persons to chemical examiner for comparison in order to connect accused persons with human semen found upon vaginal slides of prosecutrix. Even blood found upon pad and bed sheet was insufficient for further examination and semen was not detected on the pad and bed sheet. In the absence of comparison of semen of accused persons with human semen found in vaginal smear slides of prosecutrix it is not expedient in the ends of justice to convict accused persons.