Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

12. To examine the alleged infraction of the provisions of section 4, the relevant market in terms of section 2(r) of the Act needs to be delineated first where OP is operating, before determining the position of dominance of OP in the relevant market and its alleged abusive conduct. In the present matter, the dispute between the Informant and OP pertains to the sale and purchase of a specific category of server i.e., „x86 server‟. It is observed that, in terms of their end use, „x86 server‟ is different from other servers available in the market and hence it is not substitutable with other servers with different specifications. Further, there are no other products available which can be considered as a substitute for „x86 server‟. The „x86 server‟ was developed by Intel and is based on Intel 8086 CPU (Central Processing Unit) and its variant Intel 8088. It is an extension of servers to 16-bit and above. At present the „x86 server‟ are available in the format from 16-bit to 512-bit. They work with DOS, Windows, Linux, BSD, Solaris and MAC OS X. In comparison to „x86 server‟, the servers below 16-bit are not compatible to the modern technology. Further, the „x86 server‟ are used for more efficient work with low power consumption whereas other servers such as „iAPx432‟ work 5 to 10 times slower than „x86 server‟. Thus, „x86 server‟ are different from other servers in terms of efficiency and end-use. Accordingly, the relevant product market to be considered in the present case is "the market of x86 server". Since the conditions of competition of „x86 server‟ are homogenous throughout India and it can be traded throughout India without any geographic barriers, the relevant geographic market to be considered in this case would be India. Thus, the Commission is of the view that the relevant market to be considered in the present case is the "market of x86 server in India".