Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: transit remand in Said Mohammad Hussaini S/O Sayed Ali vs National Investigation Agency Thro ... on 9 June, 2023Matching Fragments
6.4 It is submitted that during the course of investigation and interrogation of arrested accused persons, it was revealed that accused namely Sobhan Aryanfar (A-8) S/o. Abdul Hamid has been involved in huge Hawala transactions for sending back the drug proceeds to Afghanistan. Accordingly, on 12.12.2021, accused Sobhan Aryanfar S/o, Abdul Hamid was arrested in the present case. On 13.12.2021, arrested accused Sobhan Aryanfar was produced before the Court of IVth Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge / Special Court for NIA Cases at Nampally, Hyderabad requesting for the transit remand. The Court granted (03) days transit period with direction to produce the accused person before the investigation in the case led to the arrest of following Afghan nationals- (i) Murtaza Hakimi @ Sahil Khan @ Mohammed Faisal, S/o. Mohammad Nadar, (ii) Alokozai Mohammad Khan@ Saif Khan, S/o. Osman Khan @ Mahmood Khan (iii) Jamshid Sakizada, NEUTRAL CITATION R/CR.A/1507/2022 ORDER DATED: 09/06/2023 undefined S/o.Mohammad Alam, & (iv) Sameer Khan @ Ahmad Shamim, S/o.Haji Mohammad Nasim, and one Uzbek national namely Ahmedova Sadokat @ Hayat, D/o. Ahmad Ahmedova. 6.5 It is submitted that, investigation conducted so far by the NIA indicates that amongst the above named arrested accused two of them namely-9) Murtaza Hakimi @ Sahil Khan @ Mohammed Faisal and 10) Alokozai Mohammad Khan@ Saif Khan were having direct links with the arrested as well as wanted accused in NIA Case RC-26/2021/NIA/DLI and have played a key role in further disposal of drugs smuggled into India from Afghanistan. It is submitted that, on 20.01.2022 NIA filed an application before this Hon'ble Court seeking Police Custody (Remand) of aforesaid accused persons. This Hon'ble Court was pleased to grant the Police Custody (Remand) for a period of 05 (Five days) (i.e. in the chargesheet accused nos. 9 and 10 are shown as accused nos.10 and 9).