Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: Abinitio void in E.I.H. Limited vs National Capital Territory Of Delhi And ... on 5 July, 2004Matching Fragments
38. A Division Bench of this court in the decision reported as , D.T.C v. D.D.Gupta & Ors. held:
"Coming now to the question as to whether the validity of suspension /termination could or could not be enquired into be the Labour Court in computation proceedings whether under Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act or under Section 15 of the Payment of Wages Act, in our view, it will all depend upon the circumstances of a case. No doubt, this question can be gone into specifically in a reference under Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, all the same if the suspension/termination is void abinitio, then the claim of the workman for computation on the assumption that he continues to be in service all through, there being no valid order of suspension/termination, can be preferred and the enquiry into the validity of the suspension/termination would become incidental to the main question of computation. We are in respectful agreement with our brother S. Ranganathan, J. in the view that he has taken on this point. We need not dilate further."