Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

(1) K.Omprakash Vs. K.Nalini reported in 1987(2) HLR 230.
(2) Rajesh Vs. Bhavna reported in Indian Kanoon.org/doc/1039203/ decided by the Bombay High Court, in W.P.No.3556 of 2008.
(3) (1) Mittal Ramesh Panchal and (2) Manoj Dayalal Panchal Vs. Nil reported in 1(2014) DMC 20 (DB) (Bom.) (4) Smt Laxmi Singh Vs. Pradeep Singh, decided by Madhya Pradesh High Court by judgment dated 20 April, 2016 in F.A.No.177 of 2011.

However, it is clear that the reliance placed upon by the appellant herein in the ruling of the Apex Court (AIR 1997 Supreme Court 1266) (cited supra) delivered in exercise of the powers under Article 142 of the Constitution of India, the Apex Court granted divorce, in order to give complete justice between the parties. Further, in the subsequent ruling relied upon by the respondent as stated above in the case of Hitesh Bhatnagar Vs. Deepa Bhatnagar, reported in (2011) 5 SCC -234, the Apex court has categorically held that the parties are at liberty to withdraw consent at any stage of the proceedings and also observed as follows:-