Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

4) Ex. CW1/D i.e. Return memo dated 16.04.2014;

5) Ex. CW1/E (Colly) i.e. Legal demand notice dated 07.05.2014 along with postal receipts and Tracking report;

6) Ex. CW1/F i.e. Original complaint.

11. CW-1 was cross examined by Accused No. 2 and 3 separately. Thereafter, vide order dated 13.10.2023, the Accused No. 1 company was proceeded against in absentia in terms of Section 304 Cr.P.C.

EXAMINATION OF THE ACCUSED UNDER SECTION 313 CR.P.C.

12. In the statement of the Accused No. 2 recorded under Section 313 Cr.P.C. on 18.12.2023, the Accused No. 2 stated that he had business dealings with the complainant. He stated that the cheque in question was given to the complainant in pursuance of the agreement Ex. CW1/B. He denied signing the cheque in question and also issuing the cheque. He stated that he has no personal liability towards the complainant as he has resigned from the directorship of Accused No. 1 company in the year 2017. He further stated that he was not concerned with the day to day affairs of Accused No.1 company and he did not receive the legal demand notice Ex.CW1/E as the address mentioned on the legal demand notice Ex. CW/E belongs to the Accused No. l company. He admitted that he was the director of the Accused No.1 company on the date of the legal demand notice.