Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: NET compulsory in [Devendra Prasad Sinha vs . State & Anr.] on 12 September, 2014Matching Fragments
apparent that the appellant has tried to downplay and hide his actual earnings or receipts and simultaneously tried to flatten his expenditures.
38. From the Income tax return of appellant / husband and his salary slip of August 2013, it is apparent that his gross salary is Rs.82,175/, which approximately can be taken as Rs.80,000/ per month. Ld.Counsel for the appellant has claimed that after compulsory deductions, his net salary is Rs.60,000/ per month only. This fact is belied, on perusal of his salary slip which reveals that he apart from compulsory provident fund deduction, is making voluntary deduction towards "provident fund" to the extent of Rs. 10,000/ per month. The same thus has to be counted while considering his monthly income and by no stretch of imagination, the same is to be deducted from his gross salary.