Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: mt. saran in Krishna And Co. vs Firm Bhagat Ram Girdhari Lal on 5 April, 1968Matching Fragments
6. Mr. J. L. Gupta has strenuously argued that since the consideration, as cited in their Hundi and as pleaded at the trial by the plaintiff, had not been established and both the Courts below had found that not a single penny was paid in cash to Muni Lal, proprietor of the appellant-concern at the time of the alleged execution of the Hundi, the plaintiff-firm was not entitled to any relief and the learned Additional District Judge had no justification for making out a case which was never pleaded by any of the parties to decree the suit. In this connection he has cited Siddik Mahomed Shah v. Mt. Saran, AIR 1930 PC 57, Trojan and Co. v. Nagappa Chettiar, AIR 1953 SC 235, Sheodhari Rai v Suraj Prasad Singh, AIR 1954 SC 758.