Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: Retainership in Official Liquidator Of Various ... vs Respondent(S) on 23 February, 2015Matching Fragments
Sr. Advocate Court / Reason of Proposed
No. Tribunal selection fee
for which
selected
1 Ms. Barsha DRT/DRAT, Consistent better Rs.15,000/-
Parulkar Mumbai performance as per month
conveyed by as
Official retainership
Liquidator,
Mumbai
2 Sh. Ankil DRT/DRAT, Having worked Rs.8,500/-
O/OLR/118/2013 ORDER
Anandraj Ahmedabad in association per month
Shah with Chartered as
Accountants retainership
firm, he is
having
experience in
company law
matter and also
done LLM from
UK.
3 Sh. Manyak Railway Most Rs.7,000/-
L. Acharya Tribunal experienced (32 per month
years of as
experience) retainership
advocate among
the candidates
applied for
empanelment as
advocate for
Railway Tribunal
4 Sh. Kiran Metropolitan Working with Rs.7,000/-
Sharma Magistrate Office of Official per month
Court Liquidator since as
many years and retainership
his performance
is good and
satisfactory.
Revision of fee
is suggested
5 Sh. Mahesh City Civil Working with Rs.9,500/-
Ramanlal Court & Office of Official per month
Shah Small Liquidator since as
Causes many years and retainership
Court his performance
is good and
satisfactory.
Revision of fee
is suggested.