Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: Audiometry in In Re vs Sh. Gajender Bahadur on 15 September, 2007Matching Fragments
17.The petitioner claimed that he was taken to Trauma Hospital on 15.8.06 and regained his consciousness on 21.8.06 and has incurred a huge medical expense on treatment , special diet, and conveyance charges. He also claimed that he has lost his working capacity and is unable to work and has become handicapped and he has lost 50% of his working capacity.
18.In his cross examination he admitted that he was discharged on 20.8.06 from the hospital. He had sustained head injury. He has also filed a prescription dated 19.9.06 wherein he has given history of fever with chills for 4 days. He has also filed an OPD card of RML Hospital dated 19.12.06 where contusion on right temporal is seen in the CT scan and treatment was given. He has also filed record of audiological record which shows that a mild high hearing loss. There is one MRI of Brain got done at G.B. Panth Hospital. At Sant Parmanand Hospital there is an audiometry report dated 20.9.06, there is also another bill of lenses. These bills and treatments shows that he has suffered head injury and was treated for the same. If a person of an advance age and he may be suffering from some ailment and the injuries of such nature triggers off those diseases and thereby it can not be said that they are not the direct result of the injuries. Except for the lenses other bills of treatments submitted are justified and are granted.