Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

3. The case of the prosecution is that the accused had published an advertisement in OLX to sell the college canteen. On seeing the advertisement, the defacto complainant approached the accused with an intention to purchase the same. It is stated that the accused was running the canteen business on a contractual basis. By giving false assurances that the canteen contract would be transferred in the name of the defacto complainant, the accused received huge amount and cheated the defacto complainant. It is further stated that the accused abused the defacto complainant in filthy language and threatened him with dire consequences. Hence, the complaint.