Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

5. There is great force in the contention of the learned Counsel for the decree-holder Devi Singh that the order under revision, if allowed to stand would not occasion failure of justice or cause irreparable injury to the judgment-debtor-petitioner Shyam Sunder. Admittedly, the suit for ejectment was failed on the ground of sub-letting also. The judgment-debtor Shyam Sunder has stated in para No. 2 of his objection petition, peper No. Bl3/7-8, dated January 19, 1984 as follows:

^^ blds vykok eg;qu es dksbZ dkywjketh dk ugh ns[kk A ljnkjiqjk es dkywjketh dk fdlh IyksV ij Hkh dCtk eg;qu us ugh ns[kk eg;qu dk dCtk ljnkjiqj es fdlh Hkh IyksV ij u dHkh Fkk A vkSj u vkt gS A eg;qu fMdzhnkj dk fdjk;snkj dHkh ugh gqvk vkSj u gh mlds fdlh IyksV ij mldk dksbZ dCtk jgk A nkok nsohflag us ljklj wB is'k fd;k gS A eg;qu us dskbZ IyksV vFkok mldk dskbZ fgLlk eksguyky o ckypUn dsk lojsD'ku ugh fd;k A pwfd eg;qu ds f[kykQ csn[kyh dh fMdzh csekus gS A D;ksfd mls bl fMdzh ds rgr dHkh Hkh csn[ky ugh gksuk gS] ysfdu ps fdjk;s dh fMdzh fMdzhnkj eg;qu ds f[kykQ btjk; djok ldrk gS A vr% mls ;g ,rjkt is'k djuk vko';d gqvk A^^ Filing of various aforesaid cases by Gangaram and Balchand also supports that the judgment-debtor Shyam Sunder is not, in fact, in possession and occupation of the suit plot for which the decree for ejectment under execution has been passed. On this ground alone, the revision petitions deserve to be dismissed as required under Proviso (b) of Sub-section (1) of Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure.