Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

1. Present petition has been preferred under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to set aside order dated 14.05.2013 of learned Additional Sessions Judge whereby Revision Petition to challenge order dated 04.03.2013 of learned Metropolitan Magistrate declining to get the matter investigated under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C. was dismissed.

2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and have examined the record. It reveals that the petitioner filed complaint case against the respondent No.2 (Piyush Saxena) for committing offences punishable under Sections 392/403/408/451/468/506/120 B IPC. Application under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C. was also filed for issuing appropriate directions for registration of FIR and for conducting investigation through police. The petitioner averred in the complaint that the respondent No.2 (Piyush Saxena) was appointed as Senior Manager (Marketing and Sales) in SNG Developers Pvt. Ltd. on 08.08.2008. Currently, he was designated AGM (Marketing and Sales). At the time of appointment, he was provided laptop, pen-drive and CDs etc. in order to facilitate the work of the company. On 21.02.2012, officials of the company at Ferozabad office handed over ` 4.45 lacs to him to deposit in Delhi office of the company. However, the respondent No.2 did not deposit the amount. When he was asked to deposit the amount he misbehaved with the Managing Director of the company. The company terminated his services and asked him to return the articles. His entry in the office premises was banned. On 24.02.2012 at 02.00 P.M. he (respondent No.2) along with his three associates forcibly entered the office premises and left after collecting files, documents and a white envelope containing some material. It further revealed that cash of ` 1 lac and some blank cheques lying in the office were also taken away.