Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: human errors in State Of H.P vs Balkrishan on 27 February, 2017Matching Fragments
The same was re-sealed by the said witness with seal 'O'.
Re-seal memo Ext. PW-4/B was prepared in this regard.
.
True it is that in the memo, there is no mention of the production of recovery memo, however, the extract of malkhana register Ext. PW-3/A reveals that PW-8 had deposited the case property along with NCB-I forms, of sample of seals and recovery memo. Not only this but in RC also, there is mention of forwarding the case property rt to Forensic Science Laboratory along with NCB forms in triplicate, recovery memo and sample of seals. True it is that it has come in the statement of PW-3 that the case property was deposited with him at 4.00 a.m., whereas, re-seal memo was prepared at 4.15 a.m. Such discrepancy, however, again is not of such a nature to discredit the prosecution case and rather the result of human error, hence should have not been given undue weightage.