Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

2. The petitioners contend that the respondent No.4 informed the respondent No.1 on 06.03.2015 about the commission of cognizable offences by the petitioners. Based on this, a case in Crime No.54/2015 was registered for the offences mentioned above. The respondent No.4 claimed that the petitioner No.1 had colluded with petitioner No.2 in creating problems at Alliance Business School and coercing and threatening some members of the staff and claiming that he was the sole custodian of the University. He alleged that the petitioner No.2, who was the Finance Head, had been systematically mismanaging the funds and accounts of the company. He alleged that on 20.02.2015, he removed the petitioner No.2 from his job in view of the complaints against him and also irregularities detected by the new Finance Head Mr. Rajendrudu. He alleged that on 01.03.2015, the petitioner No.1 barged into the office and threatened him to sign some blank papers pertaining to the Alliance Business School. When he resisted, the petitioner No.1 tried to manhandle him. He alleged that the petitioner No.1 on a few occasions in the past, had been threatening him and his staff if he did not sign the blank papers and handover the University to him and that he would not allow him to live peacefully. He also alleged that the petitioner No.1 threatened to harass his wife and children and also ensure that he would meet his end. He alleged that on 02.03.2015, when he went to the office, he came to know through his office staff that some company documents were missing. He claimed that he reported about the missing documents before the meeting of the Board of Directors on 04.03.2015. As per the directions of the Board, a complaint was lodged before the police regarding the missing share certificates, Board resolution, minutes of the meeting, share transfer forms, letterheads etc., He claimed that on 05.03.2015, when he had gone to Company Secretary's Office for a meeting, the petitioner Nos.1 and 2 along with rowdy elements barged into the office of the Company Secretary and threatened him and Mr. Rajendrudu and also manhandled them and abused them in filthy language. He therefore, alleged that the petitioner Nos.1 and 2 were making hectic attempts to take over the reins of the Alliance University. He alleged that petitioner Nos.1 and 2 were trying to bring down the reputation of the University. He accused the petitioner No.4 of colluding with the petitioner Nos.1 and 2 and helping them in their illegal acts. He claimed that petitioner No.4 had threatened him and his wife and directed them to listen to petitioner No.1 else, they would land in trouble. He alleged that petitioner No.4 along with petitioner No.3 were helping petitioner Nos.1 and 2 and extending threats that petitioner No.1 is planning to file complaints before the CBI and also to get complaints lodged through some women on the ground of sexual harassment. He alleged that he came to know that petitioners and others had colluded with each other in depositing amounts in his account as well as in the account of his wife to claim that they have purchased the shares from him and his wife. He alleged that he suspected that the petitioners would forge his signatures to seem as if he had sold the shares to them. He therefore, requested the respondent No.1 to initiate suitable action against the petitioners.

12. In the instant case, respondent No.4 claimed that he is the founder of Alliance Business School and the Chancellor of Alliance University. He alleged that petitioner No.1 herein barged into his office on 01.03.2015 and threatened him to sign some blank papers pertaining to Alliance Business School, which he resisted. He claimed that petitioner No.1 had in the past threatened him and his staff, if the University was not handed over to him. He alleged that on 02.03.2015, he came to know that some documents of the company were missing from the office, which he reported before the Board of Directors, who met on 04.03.2015 and that based on the directions by the Board, a complaint was lodged regarding the missing share certificates, Board resolutions, minutes of the meeting, share transfer forms, letterheads and other documents. He further alleged that on 05.03.2015, petitioner Nos.1 and 2 and other rowdy elements threatened him and Mr. Rajendrudu, while petitioner Nos.1 and 2 manhandled him. He therefore, alleged that petitioner Nos.1 and 2 were making hectic efforts to take over the regime of the Alliance University and that his sister (petitioner No.4 herein) had colluded with petitioner Nos.1 and 2 and was helping them in their illegal acts. With these and other allegations, the respondent No.4 alleged that petitioner Nos.1 and 2 were trying to snatch away his properties.