Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: Promissory note forgery in Babu Lal Saini Alias Sushil vs Ram Lal Saini on 17 October, 2011Matching Fragments
Having scrutinized the judgment, it appears that both the promissory note Ex.P1 as well as receipt Ex.P.2, respectively, have been duly proved by the plaintiff. The defendant has failed to shift the onus by leading any cogent evidence. Though the defendant had taken the plea with regard to forgery of the promissory note and receipt yet he has failed to establish the said plea.
No substantial question of law arises in this appeal. Dismissed.
(A.N.Jindal) 17.10.2011 Judge rp