Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: "no allocable surplus" in The Management Of India Tourism vs The General Secretary on 10 November, 2010Matching Fragments
7. Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the learned Judge has failed to note that in this case each unit viz Madras, Trichy, Trivandrum, Delhi, Bombay and Calcutta has been treated as a separate unit and separate balance sheet and profit and loss account was prepared and maintained during the past years also and the said individual balance sheets and profit and loss accounts were taken into consideration for the purpose of arriving at the allocable surplus under the Act for the payment of bonus every year to the respective individual units. Learned counsel further submitted that the learned Judge has failed to appreciate the documents viz ExM1 the balance sheet, ExM2 the statement of allocable surplus of the Madras unit, ExM5 the balance sheet of the Madras unit, ExM6 and ExM7 the accounts of the duty free shop at Madras, ExM10 to ExM12 the profit and loss accounts of Delhi duty free shop, ExM13 the consolidated accounts of all the duty free shops and ExM14 the consolidated profits and loss account of all the duty free shops and ExM2, ExM16 and ExM17 the allocable surplus account and the profit and loss accounts of Madras duty free shop.