Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: paralysis in Shriram @ Shirya S/O vs The State Of Maharashtra on 4 July, 2013Matching Fragments
4. While the earlier trial was at the final stage, it appears, police apprehended original accused No.6 Asaram and original accused No.7 Shailesh and they were sent to trial separately. That matter came up as Sessions Case No.76/2010 before the Additional Sessions Judge, Beed. Here again, prosecution brought on record the evidence of witnesses it wanted. Evidence of investigating officer Uttam Chavan, recorded in the earlier Sessions Case was directed to be read in evidence under Section 299 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C. in brief) as he could not give evidence due to paralysis. In this subsequent Sessions Case, defence examined defence witnesses also.