Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: Spinal in Noor Mohammed vs Jetha Nand & Anr on 29 January, 2013Matching Fragments
31. In Zahira Habibulla H. Sheikh and another v. State of Gujarat and others[18], emphasizing on the duty of Court to maintain public confidence in the administration of justice, this Court has poignantly held as follows: -
“35. ...Courts have always been considered to have an overriding duty to maintain public confidence in the administration of justice – often referred to as the duty to vindicate and uphold the “majesty of the law”. Due administration of justice has always been viewed as a continuous process, not confined to determination of the particular case, protecting its ability to function as a court of law in the future as in the case before it.” Thus, from the aforesaid, it is clear as day that everyone involved in the system of dispensation of justice has to inspire the confidence of the common man in the effectiveness of the judicial system. Sustenance of faith has to be treated as spinal sans sympathy or indulgence. If someone considers the task to be herculean, the same has to be performed with solemnity, for faith is the ‘elan vital’ of our system.