Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: parthiv b shah in State Of Gujarat vs Prakashkumar Kanchanlal Shah on 7 September, 2022Matching Fragments
8. Learned APP has therefore submitted that the learned Judge has committed error in giving undue weightage to minor omissions and contradictions in the evidence of prosecution witnesses and therefore the reasons given by the learned Judge while appreciating the evidence as well as while acquitting the accused are improper, perverse and bad in law. Therefore, it is submitted that the present Appeal may be allowed.
9. Per contra learned Advocate Mr. Parthiv B. Shah for the Respondents / Original Accused has heavily contended that in the present case, the material placed is not examined, and therefore, the learned Sessions Judge has rightly arrived at the acquittal of the Respondents / Original Accused Persons, and therefore, there is no requirement of interference by this Hon'ble Court.
R/CR.A/446/2008 JUDGMENT DATED: 07/09/2022
10. In view of the rival submissions made by the learned APP Ms. Jirga Jhaveri for the Appellant - State of Gujarat and learned Advocate Mr. Parthiv B. Shah for the Respondents / Original Accused, it is required to be considered whether the impugned judgment and order can be sustained or not.