Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

9. The case of the plaintiff/respondent is very simple as he is claiming title on the strength of his purchase on 30-12-81 by registered sale deed. In the sale deed the land so purchased has been described as pertaining to the present settlement Dag No. 774 (wrongly mentioned as dag 744 in the decree) and bounded by :

Cattle path ('Gopal') and on far-
ther east land of Tasir All on the
Land of Arjad All on the  East
Land of Tajmul, purchased from  West
Ajmal, and land of
Balu Mia, Makbul on the            North

and Settlement Dag No. 775 on   South
the