Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: pathway width in Smt Mangala W/O Irappa Naik vs The State Of Karnataka on 17 October, 2022Matching Fragments
7. The agreement also admits of the fact that the purchaser i.e., Sri Vithob Venkataraman Revankar
- 10 -
(Contractor) had sold the entire land that he had purchased after forming several plots thereon and he was essentially purchasing the land for the benefit of these purchasers of the land by expanding the existing pathway.
8. Infact the agreement of sale indicates that there existed a pathway width of 4 to 5 feet. The agreement also records the fact that the purchaser had made all arrangements by approaching the necessary officers to expand the existing small strip of pathway, for which, the petitioners had agreed to give a portion of their land of a width of 6 feet 7 inches from their existing boundary. Thus, it is clear that the petitioners essentially admitted the existence of pathway of 4 to 5 feet width and had offered to sell the adjacent portion of a width of land of 6 feet 7 inches for the purposes of expanding the existing pathway. In essence, under the agreement, the petitioners had agreed for formation of a road measuring 4 to 5 feet (existing) + 6 feet 7 inches (land being sold) for the formation of a road of about 12 feet width.