Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

● Mahendra Singh Chotelal Bhargad v. State of Maharashtra & Ors. (1998) 2 SCC 357.

● Sharad Birdhichand Sarda v. State of Maharashtra, (1984) 4 SCC

116. ● Kali Ram v. State of Himachal Pradesh, (1973) 2 SCC 808. ● C. Chenga Reddy v. State of A.P. (1996) 10 SCC 193. ● Subramanian Swamy v. A. Raja, (2012) 9 SCC 257. ● Raj Kumar Singh @ Raju @ Batya v. State of Rajasthan, (2013) 5 SCC 722.

● Nar Singh v. State of Haryana, (2015) 1 SCC 496. ● Leo Roy Frey v. Suppdt. Distt. Jail, AIR 1958 SC 119. ● Wolfgang Reim & Ors. v. State & Anr., (2012) SCC Online Del3341.

28.Reliance was also placed upon cases of State of Kerala v. P. Sugathan (supra), P.K. Narayanan (supra), Om Prakash (supra), L.K. Advani (supra), Leo Roy Frey (supra), Subramanian Swamy (supra), Wolfgang Reim (supra), K.R. Purushothaman (supra), K.R. Purushothaman (supra), V.C. Shukla (supra), CBI v. V.C. Shukla (supra), Yogesh (supra) and Kehar Singh (supra), to submit that "Criminal conspiracy cannot be deemed to have been established on the basis of mere suspicion or surmises and there needs to be cogent evidence to prove the same."

PRESUMPTION :-

29.Reliance was placed upon cases of Subramanian Swamy (supra), Raj Kumar Singh (supra) and Kali Ram (supra), to submit that "Conviction cannot be recorded merely on the basis of presumption."

Page 45 of 67 (Pulastya Pramachala)

Special Judge (PC Act) CBI, East District Karkardooma Courts, Delhi CBI/19/2016 SECTION 313 CR.P.C :-