Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

20. Private respondent No.5 vehemently opposed the contentions and stated that promotion of applicants in the DPC held in 1982 was provisional subject to OP No.6037/1982 before the Calcutta High Court and there was no challenge to the DPC minutes. It is stated that seniority of 23.4.1984 when challenged was quashed. It is stated that eligibility list when finalized in 1982 only 7 vacancies were there but without any vacancies more than 100 persons were promoted, including juniors to applicants before the Calcutta Bench, i.e., applicants. Accordingly a wrong promotion given to them though may be protected but consequences of it like seniority would not be allowed.